Early liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease has excellent survival but higher rates of harmful alcohol use.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early liver transplantation for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has increased worldwide. Short-term outcomes have been favorable, but data on longer-term outcomes are lacking. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of primary LT recipients between 2010-2020, with follow-up through July 1, 2022. Survival analysis was performed using log rank, Cox models, and Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models were created to identify variables associated with mortality, logistic regression to identify variables associated with post-LT alcohol use. RESULTS: Of 708 patients who underwent LT, 110 (15.5%) had ALD and abstinence <6 months prior to LT (ELT), 234 (33.1%) had ALD and alcohol abstinence >6 months (SLT), and 364 (51.4%) had non-ALD diagnoses. Median follow-up was 4.6 years (IQR 2.6, 7.3). ELT recipients were younger (p=0.001) with median abstinence pre-LT of 61.5 days. On adjusted Cox model, post-LT survival was similar in ELT and SLT (HR 1.31, p=0.30) and superior to non-ALD (HR 1.68, p=0.04). Alcohol use (40.9% vs 21.8%, p<0.001) and harmful alcohol use (31.2% vs 16.0%, p=0.002) were more common in ELT recipients. Harmful alcohol use was associated with post-LT mortality on univariate (HR 1.69, p=0.03), but not multivariable regression (HR 1.54, p=0.10). Recurrence of decompensated ALD trended toward more common in ELT (9.1% vs 4.4%, p=0.09). Greater than 6 months pre-LT abstinence was associated with a decreased risk of harmful alcohol use (OR 0.42, p=0.001), but not in a multivariable model (OR 0.71, p=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo ELT for ALD have similar or better survival than other diagnoses in the first 10-years after LT despite a higher incidence of post-LT alcohol use.

Prognostic models in alcohol-related liver disease and alcohol-related hepatitis.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) are dynamic disorders whose prognosis can be challenging to determine. A number of prognostic models have been developed to determine likelihood of death, when to refer for liver transplant (LT) and the role for glucocorticoids. Often these models were created with a specific application in mind but were found to have additional applications with further study. Those prognostic models that have stood the test of time are easy to use, have clear interpretations and employ objective parameters. These parameters most often include total bilirubin, INR and creatinine among other data points. Ideally, these models could be utilized at all phases of disease but in most, it is important for clinicians to consider drinking history and how it might alter the determined scores. Herein we provide a brief review of prognostic models in ALD and AH and provide practical tips and considerations to successfully make use of these tools in a clinical setting.

A Case of Progressive Cholestatic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Due to Terbinafine.

INTRODUCTION: Terbinafine is commonly prescribed for onychomycosis. It rarely leads to severe, prolonged cholestatic drug-induced liver injury. Clinicians should remain vigilant for this complication. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old woman was started on terbinafine and developed mixed hepatocellular and cholestatic drug-induced liver injury, confirmed on liver biopsy. The injury became predominantly cholestatic. Unfortunately, she developed coagulopathy with elevated international normalized ratio and progressive drug-induced liver injury with severely elevated alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin, requiring repeat liver biopsy. Fortunately, she did not develop acute liver failure. DISCUSSION: Prior case reports and series have documented severe cholestatic drug-induced liver injury (although with lesser degree of bilirubin elevation) due to terbinafine, which has very rarely been associated with acute liver failure, need for liver transplantation, and/or death. CONCLUSIONS: Non-acetaminophen drug-induced liver injury is idiosyncratic. Complications including acute liver failure and vanishing bile duct syndrome can be slow to develop, so monitoring for them is important over longitudinal follow-up.

Psychosocial assessment in liver transplantation (LT): an analysis of short-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Our research showed that patients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) had more severe liver disease than those without a diagnosis of ALD yet were less likely to be selected for transplant listing due to their increased psychosocial vulnerability. This study aims to answer whether this vulnerability translates to worse short-term outcomes after transplant listing. METHODS: A total of 187 patients were approved for liver transplant listing and are included in the present retrospective study. We collected dates of transplantation, retransplantation, death, and pathologic data for evidence of rejection, and reviewed alcohol biomarkers and documentation for evidence of alcohol use. RESULTS: The ALD cohort had higher Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) scores (39.4 vs. 22.5, p <0.001) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na scores (25.0 vs. 18.5, p <0.001) compared with the non-ALD cohort. Forty-nine (59.7%) subjects with ALD and 60 (57.1%, p =0.71) subjects without ALD subsequently received a liver transplant. Overall mortality was similar between the 2 groups (20.7% ALD vs. 21.0% non-ALD, p =0.97). Neither the SIPAT score (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96-1.00, p =0.11) nor MELD-Na score (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.02, p =0.40) were associated with mortality. Patients with ALD were more likely to have alcohol biomarkers tested both before (84.1% vs. 24.8% non-ALD, p <0.001) and after liver transplantation (74.0% vs. 16.7% non-ALD, p <0.001). SIPAT score was associated with alcohol use after listing (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.0-1.07, p =0.04), although a return to alcohol use was not associated with mortality (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.63-4.10, p =0.33). CONCLUSION: Patients with ALD had higher psychosocial risk compared with patients without a diagnosis of ALD who were placed on the waitlist, but had similar short-term outcomes including mortality, transplantation, and rejection. Although a high SIPAT score was predictive of alcohol use, in the short-term, alcohol use after transplant listing was not associated with mortality.

Recovery and outcomes of patients denied early liver transplantation for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) in alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) remains controversial, in part because spontaneous recovery (SR) can occur. There is a paucity of data on SR in patients with severe AH who undergo LT evaluation. The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with SR and survival in patients with severe AH who undergo LT evaluation. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective study of ALD patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) >25 and <90 days abstinence who underwent LT evaluation at a single center between 2012 and 2018. One hundred forty-four patients (median age, 45.5 years; 68.1% male) were included. Forty-nine (34%) underwent LT and 95 (66%) patients did not undergo LT, and of those, 34 (23.6%) experienced SR. Factors associated with recovery were younger age (OR, 0.92; p = 0.004), lower index international normalized ratio (INR; 0.31; p = 0.03), and lower peak MELD (OR, 0.83; p = 0.02). Only 7 patients (20.6%) achieved a compensated state with a MELD <15 and absence of therapy for ascites or HE. Survival was improved in patients who underwent early LT when compared to SR. Survival was impaired in SR following relapse to alcohol use when compared to SR patients who abstained and LT recipients. Among all 6-month survivors of AH, alcohol use trended toward an association with mortality (HR, 2.05; p = 0.17), but only LT was associated with decreased mortality risk (HR, 0.20; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SR from AH after LT evaluation is associated with age, index INR, and lower peak MELD. Most recovered patients continue to experience end-stage complications. LT is the only factor associated with lower mortality.

The Level of Alcohol Consumption in the Prior Year Does Not Impact Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.

The 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-10) and its shorter form, AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C), are questionnaires used to characterize severity of drinking. We hypothesized that liver injury and short-term outcomes of alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) would correlate with a patient's recent alcohol consumption as determined by AUDIT-10 and AUDIT-C. We analyzed a prospective international database of patients with AH diagnosed based on the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) standard definitions. All patients were interviewed using AUDIT-10. Primary outcomes included the discriminatory ability of the AUDIT-10 and AUDIT-C scores for predicting survival status at 28 and 90 days and severity of liver injury, as measured by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na). The relationship between AUDIT scores and survival status was quantified by calculating the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The relationship between AUDIT scores and MELD-Na was examined using correlation coefficients. In 245 patients (age range 25-75 years; 35% female), we found no correlation between AUDIT-10 or AUDIT-C scores and either 28- or 90-day mortality. Similarly, there was no correlation between AUDIT-10 and AUDIT-C and MELD-Na scores. There was a strong positive correlation between MELD-Na and 28- and 90-day mortality. Additional measures of severity of alcohol use (average grams of alcohol consumed per day, years of drinking, convictions for driving under the influence, and rehabilitation attempts) and psychosocial factors (marriage, paid employment, and level of social support) had no influence on MELD-Na. In patients presenting with AH, AUDIT-10 and AUDIT-C were predictors of neither clinical severity of liver disease nor short-term mortality, suggesting that level of alcohol consumption in the prior year is not key to the presenting features or outcome of AH.

Novel treatments for alcoholic hepatitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current article aims to review the latest literature on updates in therapeutics for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), integration of treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) into the management of ALD, and the role of liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis. RECENT FINDINGS: ALD has recently become the most common indication for liver transplantation due to the increasing prevalence of AUD and the paucity of therapeutic options. There is broad consensus on the importance of early identification of AUD and the incorporation of its treatment in the management of ALD. New targets for treatment of alcoholic hepatitis include the gut-liver axis, anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidants, and drugs with hepatic regenerative potential. Fecal transplantation in particular has had favorable outcomes at 1 year. n-Acetylcysteine in addition to corticosteroids, granulocyte colony stimulating factor, and IL-22 have also shown improved short-term outcomes. A number of other therapies are being studied in clinical trials and their results are anxiously awaited. SUMMARY: In summary, there are several promising therapeutic options under clinical investigation for the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis and ALD; however, alcohol abstinence is key. In the absence of other effective therapies, liver transplantation for ALD remains a life-saving treatment with excellent patient and graft survival.